TOEIC 閱讀 Part 7 — 題目

段落

Review: "The Golden Spoon" Delights and Disappoints
Came here last Friday evening with my partner. We heard good things, especially about their seafood. The atmosphere was lively, but quite loud.

For starters, we tried the calamari. It was perfectly crispy, a great way to begin. However, the main course, grilled salmon, was a bit dry. My partner’s pasta dish, the carbonara, was reportedly very good.

Dessert was a mixed bag. The chocolate lava cake was satisfyingly gooey, but the fruit sorbet was surprisingly bland. Service was generally friendly, though our waiter seemed rushed. He did mention they are planning a special event next month related to an upcoming **artificial intelligence workshop** they are hosting for local businesses, which sounded interesting. Overall, a decent experience, but slightly inconsistent with the food.

閱讀完整段落 →

題目

What did the reviewer think of the chocolate lava cake?

選項

  1. A. It was too dry
  2. B. It was bland
  3. C. It was satisfyingly gooey ✓
  4. D. It was not available

正確答案

C. It was satisfyingly gooey

解析

[KO]
📖 지문/질문 해석: 리뷰어는 초콜릿 라바 케이크에 대해 어떻게 생각했는가?
📝 정답 이유: 지문에는 "The chocolate lava cake was satisfyingly gooey"라고 명시되어 있으므로, 보기 C) "It was satisfyingly gooey"가 정답입니다.
💡 실전팁: 디저트나 특정 음식에 대한 평가를 묻는 문제는 해당 음식에 대한 묘사 부분을 주의 깊게 읽어야 합니다.
📊 오답분석: A) "It was too dry" - 케이크가 건조하다는 언급이 없습니다. B) "It was bland" - 칸타로페 소르베가 밋밋했다는 언급은 있지만, 초콜릿 라바 케이크에 대한 묘사는 아닙니다. D) "It was not available" - 케이크를 주문하고 맛보았으므로 이용 가능했습니다.

---

[JA]
📖 本文の和訳: レビュアーはチョコレートラヴァケーキについてどう思いましたか？
📝 正解の理由: 本文には「The chocolate lava cake was satisfyingly gooey」と明記されているため、選択肢C「It was satisfyingly gooey」が正解です。
💡 試験対策のヒント: デザートや特定の料理に関する評価を問う問題では、その料理の描写部分を注意深く読むことが重要です。
📊 不正解の選択肢の分析: A) 「It was too dry」- ケーキが乾燥していたという言及はありません。B) 「It was bland」- メロンソルベが味気なかったという言及はありますが、チョコレートラヴァケーキの描写ではありません。D) 「It was not available」- ケーキを注文して食べたので、利用可能でした。

---

[TH]
📖 คำแปลบทอ่าน/คำถาม: ผู้รีวิวคิดอย่างไรกับเค้กช็อกโกแลตลาวา?
📝 เหตุผลที่เลือกคำตอบ: ในบทอ่านระบุไว้ชัดเจนว่า "The chocolate lava cake was satisfyingly gooey" ดังนั้นตัวเลือก C) "It was satisfyingly gooey" จึงเป็นคำตอบที่ถูกต้อง
💡 เคล็ดลับสำหรับวันสอบ: คำถามที่ถามเกี่ยวกับการประเมินของหวานหรืออาหารบางประเภท จำเป็นต้องอ่านส่วนที่อธิบายอาหารนั้นๆ อย่างละเอียด
📊 การวิเคราะห์ตัวเลือกที่ไม่ถูกต้อง: A) "It was too dry" - ไม่มีการกล่าวถึงว่าเค้กแห้งเกินไป B) "It was bland" - มีการกล่าวถึงว่าซอร์เบท์ผลไม้จืดชืด แต่ไม่ใช่การอธิบายเค้กช็อกโกแลตลาวา C) "It was satisfyingly gooey" - นี่คือคำอธิบายที่ถูกต้อง D) "It was not available" - เค้กมีจำหน่ายเพราะถูกสั่งและชิมแล้ว

---

[VI]
📖 Diễn giải đoạn văn/câu hỏi: Người đánh giá nghĩ gì về bánh sô cô la lava?
📝 Lý do chọn đáp án: Đoạn văn nêu rõ "The chocolate lava cake was satisfyingly gooey" (Bánh sô cô la lava rất mềm dẻo đúng như mong đợi), do đó lựa chọn C) "It was satisfyingly gooey" là đáp án đúng.
💡 Mẹo làm bài thi: Đối với các câu hỏi về đánh giá món tráng miệng hoặc món ăn cụ thể, điều quan trọng là phải đọc kỹ phần mô tả về món ăn đó.
📊 Phân tích các lựa chọn sai: A) "It was too dry" - Không có đề cập nào nói rằng chiếc bánh bị khô. B) "It was bland" - Có đề cập đến việc sorbet trái cây nhạt nhẽo, ​​nhưng đó không phải là mô tả về bánh sô cô la lava. D) "It was not available" - Chiếc bánh đã có sẵn vì đã được gọi và nếm thử.

---

[ID]
📖 Terjemahan Bacaan/Pertanyaan: Apa pendapat pengulas tentang kue lava cokelat?
📝 Alasan memilih jawaban ini: Teks tersebut secara eksplisit menyatakan "The chocolate lava cake was satisfyingly gooey" (Kue lava cokelatnya sangat lembut dan meleleh sesuai harapan), oleh karena itu pilihan C) "It was satisfyingly gooey" adalah jawaban yang benar.
💡 Tips saat ujian: Untuk pertanyaan yang menanyakan tentang ulasan hidangan penutup atau makanan tertentu, sangat penting untuk membaca dengan saksama bagian yang mendeskripsikan makanan tersebut.
📊 Analisis pilihan jawaban yang salah: A) "It was too dry" - Tidak ada penyebutan bahwa kue tersebut terlalu kering. B) "It was bland" - Ada penyebutan bahwa sorbet buahnya hambar, tetapi itu bukan deskripsi kue lava cokelat. D) "It was not available" - Kue tersebut tersedia karena sudah dipesan dan dicicipi.

---

[MS]
📖 Terjemahan Petikan/Soalan: Apakah pendapat pengulas tentang kek lava coklat?
📝 Sebab jawapan ini betul: Petikan itu secara jelas menyatakan "The chocolate lava cake was satisfyingly gooey" (Kek lava coklatnya sangat memuaskan kerana lembut dan cair), oleh itu pilihan C) "It was satisfyingly gooey" adalah jawapan yang betul.
💡 Petua hari ujian: Bagi soalan yang bertanya tentang ulasan pencuci mulut atau hidangan tertentu, adalah penting untuk membaca dengan teliti bahagian yang memperincikan hidangan tersebut.
📊 Analisis pilihan jawapan salah: A) "It was too dry" - Tiada sebutan bahawa kek itu terlalu kering. B) "It was bland" - Terdapat penyebutan bahawa sorbet buah itu tawar, tetapi itu bukanlah huraian untuk kek lava coklat. D) "It was not available" - Kek itu ada kerana ia telah ditempah dan dirasa.

---

[PT-BR]
📖 Tradução da Passagem/Pergunta: O que o revisor achou do bolo de lava de chocolate?
📝 Razão para esta resposta: A passagem afirma explicitamente "The chocolate lava cake was satisfyingly gooey" (O bolo de lava de chocolate estava agradavelmente cremoso/molinho), portanto a opção C) "It was satisfyingly gooey" está correta.
💡 Dica para o dia da prova: Para questões que perguntam sobre a avaliação de sobremesas ou pratos específicos, é crucial ler atentamente a seção que descreve o prato.
📊 Análise das opções incorretas: A) "It was too dry" - Não há menção de que o bolo estava seco. B) "It was bland" - Há uma menção de que o sorbet de frutas era sem graça, mas essa não é a descrição do bolo de lava de chocolate. D) "It was not available" - O bolo estava disponível, pois foi pedido e provado.

---

[MY]
📖 လေ့လာရန်/မေးခွန်း ဘာသာပြန်: ချောကလက် လဖကလေးအပေါ် သုံးသပ်သူရဲ့ အမြင်က ဘာလဲ။
📝 အဖြေမှန်ရခြင်းအကြောင်းရင်း: စာပိုဒ်ထဲမှာ "The chocolate lava cake was satisfyingly gooey" (ချောကလက် လဖကလေးက စိတ်ကျေနပ်လောက်အောင် စေးကပ်နေပါတယ်) ဆိုတာကို ရှင်းရှင်းလင်းလင်း ဖော်ပြထားတာကြောင့်၊ C) "It was satisfyingly gooey" ဆိုတဲ့ အကြောင်းအရာက မှန်ကန်ပါတယ်။
💡 စာမေးပွဲနေ့အတွက် အကြံပြုချက်: မုန့်အချိုပွဲ ဒါမှမဟုတ် အစားအစာတစ်ခုခုရဲ့ သုံးသပ်ချက်ကို မေးတဲ့ မေးခွန်းတွေမှာ၊ အဲဒီအစားအစာကို ဖော်ပြထားတဲ့ အပိုင်းကို ဂရုတစိုက်ဖတ်ဖို့ အရေးကြီးပါတယ်။
📊 အဖြေမှားများကို ခွဲခြမ်းစိတ်ဖြာခြင်း: A) "It was too dry" - ကိတ်မုန့်က အလွန်အမင်း ခြောက်သွေ့နေတယ်လို့ ဖော်ပြထားတာမျိုး မရှိပါဘူး။ B) "It was bland" - သစ်သီး sorbet က အရသာမရှိဘူးလို့ ဆိုထားပေမယ့်၊ ဒါက ချောကလက် လဖ ကိတ်မုန့်ကို ဖော်ပြတာ မဟုတ်ပါဘူး။ D) "It was not available" - ကိတ်မုန့်ကို မှာယူပြီး မြည်းစမ်းခဲ့တာကြောင့် ရရှိနိုင်ခဲ့ပါတယ်။

---
---
[ZH-TW]
📖 文章翻譯 — 此評論的標題為「金湯匙」的美味與令人失望之處。評論者與伴侶於上週五晚間造訪，他們聽聞該餐廳尤其以海鮮聞名。餐廳氣氛熱絡但有些吵雜。作為開胃菜，他們嘗試了炸花枝，口感酥脆，是很棒的開始。然而，主菜烤鮭魚有點乾。伴侶點的義大利麵（卡邦尼）據說非常好吃。甜點部分評價不一，巧克力熔岩蛋糕令人感到十分滿意，但水果雪酪出乎意料地平淡。服務普遍友善，但服務生似乎很趕時間。
📝 答案解析 — 評論者在提及甜點時寫道：「The chocolate lava cake was satisfyingly gooey」。這直接對應了選項「C) It was satisfyingly gooey」，表示熔岩蛋糕的口感令人滿意。關鍵詞「satisfyingly gooey」清楚地說明了蛋糕的質地，這正是這題正確答案的依據。
💡 應試技巧 — 閱讀甜點部分的評論時，注意描述味道或質地的形容詞，例如「gooey」、「bland」、「dry」，並將其與選項中的形容詞進行配對。
📊 錯誤選項分析 — X) It was too dry — 評論中提到「烤鮭魚 was a bit dry」，而非熔岩蛋糕。X) It was bland — 評論中提到「水果 sorbet was surprisingly bland」，指的是雪酪，不是熔岩蛋糕。X) It was not available — 評論中明確提到了巧克力熔岩蛋糕，表示它並非沒有提供。
---
[EN]
📖 Passage/Question Translation: What did the reviewer think of the chocolate lava cake?
📝 Why this answer is correct: The passage explicitly states "The chocolate lava cake was satisfyingly gooey," making option C) "It was satisfyingly gooey" the correct answer.
💡 Test-day tip: For questions asking about the review of desserts or specific dishes, it is crucial to carefully read the section describing that particular food item.
📊 Wrong-option analysis: A) "It was too dry" - There is no mention of the cake being too dry. B) "It was bland" - There is a mention that the fruit sorbet was bland, but that is not the description of the chocolate lava cake. D) "It was not available" - The cake was available as it was ordered and tasted.

相關題目